【獨家】賠償制度不合理 警大、警專 - 考試
By Anthony
at 2017-05-28T22:12
at 2017-05-28T22:12
Table of Contents
【獨家】賠償制度不合理 警大、警專招生新增「免賠門檻」
新聞網址:http://tinyurl.com/yb22azyj
2017年05月28日11:31 黃信維/台北報導
警大、警專生過去規定,若在畢業後3年內未通過特考,不但暫不能當警察,更恐賠償百
萬元教育訓練費!不過,在立委質詢、監察院要求改善後,警大、警專在今年的招生簡章
中,新增免予賠償公費規定,畢業後連續參加3次任用考試,且3次總成績距離錄取標準在
30%以內者或畢業三年內因傷病、痼疾不能通過特考,持有公立醫院證明者,將免予賠償
。
依招生簡章中顯示,免賠標準條件的30%設置,是以2010年雙軌分流後的三等考試行政警
察人員類科平均錄取標準72.46分計算,30%以內為50.72分,且須連續3次均達標準,始符
合申請免賠條件。資料說明,雙軌分流後的6年考試狀況,行政類別應考人數均占所有應
考人數近5成,且行政類別錄取人數亦佔所有類別錄取人數的2成,其所面臨挑戰最為嚴峻
,故以其為計算標準。
綠委莊瑞雄受訪時指出,大學畢業生考上警察特考,受訓一半不當警察不需賠錢,但警專
、警大專職公費畢業生,沒考上特考卻要賠錢,制度不公。莊瑞雄強調,像是他過去選區
有一名警大畢業生,但因血癌無法在三年內通過考試,導致須賠償費用,新的規定是好的
方向,「是回應人民期待」。
時代力量立委徐永明指出,警專、警大生不該是被逼著當警察,可能有些人唸完書後不想
當,或是想當但一直都考不過,還要學生賠錢並不合理,所以研擬新的免賠規定值得肯定
。但徐永明指出,應有更完善的退場機制,讓真的不適應的人能夠有再重新規劃生涯的機
會,這是未來警專、警大要再思考的方向。
http://tinyurl.com/y86owcfu
警大、警專修改賠償規定。資料照片
--
All Comments
By Agnes
at 2017-06-02T18:55
at 2017-06-02T18:55
By Sarah
at 2017-06-05T11:43
at 2017-06-05T11:43
By Una
at 2017-06-08T20:56
at 2017-06-08T20:56
By Kumar
at 2017-06-10T00:03
at 2017-06-10T00:03
By Rosalind
at 2017-06-13T13:53
at 2017-06-13T13:53
By Quanna
at 2017-06-16T03:01
at 2017-06-16T03:01
By Olivia
at 2017-06-19T05:34
at 2017-06-19T05:34
By George
at 2017-06-21T08:04
at 2017-06-21T08:04
By Brianna
at 2017-06-24T03:28
at 2017-06-24T03:28
By Lauren
at 2017-06-28T00:07
at 2017-06-28T00:07
By Dora
at 2017-07-02T14:42
at 2017-07-02T14:42
By Lauren
at 2017-07-06T09:09
at 2017-07-06T09:09
By Margaret
at 2017-07-07T03:45
at 2017-07-07T03:45
By Agnes
at 2017-07-07T12:16
at 2017-07-07T12:16
By Mary
at 2017-07-11T11:48
at 2017-07-11T11:48
By Olive
at 2017-07-15T04:43
at 2017-07-15T04:43
By Faithe
at 2017-07-15T18:13
at 2017-07-15T18:13
By Jake
at 2017-07-17T14:11
at 2017-07-17T14:11
By Odelette
at 2017-07-20T07:08
at 2017-07-20T07:08
By David
at 2017-07-24T09:48
at 2017-07-24T09:48
By Ula
at 2017-07-27T02:29
at 2017-07-27T02:29
By Connor
at 2017-07-31T18:41
at 2017-07-31T18:41
By Hazel
at 2017-08-04T02:21
at 2017-08-04T02:21
By Ursula
at 2017-08-08T06:09
at 2017-08-08T06:09
By Genevieve
at 2017-08-12T02:22
at 2017-08-12T02:22
By Leila
at 2017-08-12T19:00
at 2017-08-12T19:00
By Frederica
at 2017-08-15T14:11
at 2017-08-15T14:11
By Donna
at 2017-08-19T08:51
at 2017-08-19T08:51
By Anonymous
at 2017-08-22T09:40
at 2017-08-22T09:40
By Edith
at 2017-08-27T01:38
at 2017-08-27T01:38
Related Posts
法學緒論-民法繼承該用應繼分或特留分?
By Robert
at 2017-05-28T15:09
at 2017-05-28T15:09
四大稅務部的問題
By Emily
at 2017-05-28T08:49
at 2017-05-28T08:49
成會 稅後現金收入
By Necoo
at 2017-05-27T23:47
at 2017-05-27T23:47
中鋼鋁業的現況建議
By Eden
at 2017-05-27T21:02
at 2017-05-27T21:02
寫考古充滿挫折
By Olive
at 2017-05-27T20:24
at 2017-05-27T20:24